pgaudet

Hi @raymond91125 Have these terms all been obsoleted now ?

Hi, Discussing with @colinlog In fact your comment applies to the while branch: GO:0016604 nuclear body - [GO:0015030 Cajal body](https://amigo.geneontology.org/amigo/term/GO:0015030#display-lineage-tab) - [GO:0071920 cleavage body](https://amigo.geneontology.org/amigo/term/GO:0071920#display-lineage-tab) - [GO:0097504 Gemini of Cajal bodies](https://amigo.geneontology.org/amigo/term/GO:0097504#display-lineage-tab)...

Can you please specify why this is being obsoleted? I thoght we had decided to keep some of the grouping terms?

You wrote in #25541 > autophagy of peroxisome -> obsolete, unnecessary grouping class Annotation tracker ticket https://github.com/geneontology/go-annotation/issues/4753 Oboletion notice https://github.com/geneontology/go-announcements/issues/600~ Kept as do not annotate

- GO:0000155 phosphorelay sensor kinase activity - GO:0008241 | peptidyl-dipeptidase activity - GO:0016807 | cysteine-type carboxypeptidase activity - GO:0004252 | serine-type endopeptidase activity - GO:0004298 | threonine-type endopeptidase activity

@sjm41 > Should we only list leaf terms (with no mappings) here? I would list *any* term we want t okeep without mappings, it seems to me it would be...

For peptidases we aligned on MEROPs (right @sjm41 ?) . We should see to have MEROPS xrefs on as many terms as possible (I thought we had them for all...

> Do I need to add the dcterms:conformsTo URL the same as the siblings and the equivalence axioms? No, this comes automatically when you add the logical definition.

@Achchuthan Can you please have a look at this ticket ?

@uliboehme Can you look into it?