pgaudet
pgaudet
Thanks @amandamackie We can keep the term if it is needed. The conflicting UniProt description made me wonder if the small oligo was physiologically relevant: > 3'-to-5' exoribonuclease specific for...
See also PMID:36026528 The authors seem to indicate that orn is a dinuclease https://enzyme.expasy.org/EC/3.1.3.7 ? EC:3.1.3.7 seems more correct than https://enzyme.expasy.org/EC/3.1.13.3?
Sounds good !
There are still many annotations to human genes: (and mouse): https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/annotations?goUsage=descendants&goUsageRelationships=is_a,part_of,occurs_in&goId=GO:0016032&evidenceCode=ECO:0000269&evidenceCodeUsage=descendants&taxonId=9606&taxonUsage=descendants Some are incorrect, but some might be interesting to annotate under host-symbiont interaction, for example: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33082294 https://europepmc.org/article/MED/9573242 What do...
Discussing with @genegodbold Whatever we do, these terms should probably NOT be allowed for ISS-type or IEA annotations, since they are specific for specific host/symbiont pairs.
Hi @balhoff RHEA folks also noted that in the go.owl and go.obo, only broad and exact RHEAs are exported, but narrow are missing. Could all xrefs be added to all...
It seems we didn't do what was requested: > probably NARROW and EXACT synonyms are OK; but we may not want to include BROAD synonyms for mappings. We dont have...
But NARROW are valid to make GO annotations. Why would we remove those?
I'll put this on next Monday's call.