Robert Pająk

[This applied suggestion](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/pull/4552#discussion_r2142879327) makes this PR blocked by: - https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/pull/4535

SIG meeting notes: Because of e.g. https://protobuf.dev/programming-guides/enum/#java it is safer to allow only 0..24 values. I am going to propose a separate issues/PRs to address it.

> Because of e.g. https://protobuf.dev/programming-guides/enum/#java it is safer to allow only 0..24 values. I am going to propose a separate issues/PRs to address it. I feel that this PR does...

Logs SIG meeting: We agreed that this PR does conflict proposal to allow only allow/support 0..24 SeverityNumber values and that this PR polishes and clarifies the specification. We also agreed...

SIG meeting notes: Waiting a little more to give a chance for more people to review (most notably @tigrannajaryan).

I created this issue as I think it was brought up a few times. My personal opinion, is that for sake of simplicity we should only have Event Name as...

Was this PR created by mistake?