Joseph (Joe) Osborn
Joseph (Joe) Osborn
Can I suggest that we organize this differently? Let's have a directory structure that looks like offline -- packages ---- Skimmers ------- Jets ---------- JetSkimmer.cc/h/makefile/etc Then we can make other...
I don't think we ever decided on a specific name - every collaboration has their own but I don't think we came to a conclusion. Slimmer and skimmer could in...
They're intended to be used to write out smaller DSTs that meet certain criteria
Somehow this kills our efficiency. Needs more debugging apparently
Let's wait until next week to merge this in case there are unforeseen consequences...
@pinkenburg this shouldn't break anything as it is just adding additional functionality - but a second set of eyes wouldn't hurt...
This can be the poster child showing clang-tidy actually does find problems in code...
Looks like the newer version of g++ picks up a possible error https://web.sdcc.bnl.gov/jenkins-sphenix/job/sPHENIX/job/Build-Master-gcc14/401/artifact/build/new/rebuild.log/*view*/ I would login to an alma9 node, try to compile there, and debug and push a commit
This improves the efficiency in the simulation pretty substantially, do you have some QA checks on the data too?
How does this mesh with Michael's PR? Maybe we should come up with a plan for how to merge both and/or understand how they help/hurt each other