Nicolás Venturo

Hello @crazyrabbitLTC, thanks for the report! I made a simple project to test this but was unable to reproduce the bug. Could you share more details of your setup? This...

@ppoliani thanks for the report! Could you share more information about your setup? We were unable to reproduce the original error.

I had not heard about TrueBlocks (which seems to also be called [QuickBlocks](https://quickblocks.io/)?) before, but at a glance it doesn't seem like it might be the best choice to build...

Changing delays is a bit tricky: if decreasing the delay, you'd then need to wait at least the difference between delays before making the change, and if increasing it you...

Hello @wighawag, thank you for reporting this! How would you suggest to change the implementation? If, as you've mentioned, that function is called with less than 30k gas available, then...

>check for gas (via gasleft()) before the call but need to account for the gas required between the call to gasleft() and the actual call What is the intent behind...

Thanks for reporting this @wighawag, I had forgotten about the 63/64ths rule. In the worst case, a contract needs 30k gas to execute its function, and is provided only 29,999....

@frangio is the idea behind that check to not require the caller tx to have over 30k gas? Shouldn't we also only revert if the call failed? i.e. if the...

A call may return with less than that value and not have reverted, or It may have reverted for a different reason.

...but the whole point of this is what happens when _less_ than 30k are sent? And a post-check will not know how much was actually sent.