Kris Nuttycombe

Results 232 issues of Kris Nuttycombe

This is an idea that was discussed in the process of Orchard protocol development, but was rejected at the time as being too significant a difference relative to Sapling. I...

ZIP number assigned
consensus
F-transaction-v6
NU7 proposal

Key expiry is important. We should make it possible for the producer of a unified address to convey the information that they don't wish a particular address to be usable...

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/27591/166973024-8ce2dd31-946f-4eca-9633-c0d167d72519.png) The version check should be `>= 4`

https://github.com/zcash/zips/issues/494 identifies the need to include the consensus_branch_id value in the transaction format to avoid potential mismatches between transaction IDs computed before and after a network upgrade boundary. After this...

F-transaction-v6

When starting up ZecWallet FullNode version 1.7.5, the UI seems to have some problem connecting to the 4.5.1 full node; I get the "please look at the debug.log file" message...

Also, this adds functionality to create and insert records into the block metadata db that is used as the source for which blocks to read.

Add an explicit check for unspent transparent outputs whenever running initialization with a version of the zcash_client_sqlite library *not* compiled with the `transparent-inputs` feature flag, and fail if any are...

`blocks.hash` should be indexed I think. Actually it should maybe be UNIQUE, since zcashd pervasively assumes block hashes are unique. _Originally posted by @daira in https://github.com/zcash/librustzcash/pull/600#discussion_r946168618_

This reminds me that we need to ensure that we handle search for the child 0 "diversified" transparent address correctly even when the Sapling default address is at a different...

This string matching is a bit ugly; can `UnifiedFullViewingKey::decode` return an enum for its error type instead? _Originally posted by @nuttycom in https://github.com/zcash/zcash-android-wallet-sdk/pull/530#discussion_r902009347_

E-good-first-issue