Pablo Baeyens

It's usually hard for me to join this meeting, but I may be able to join on Monday.

Based on https://github.com/open-telemetry/semantic-conventions/pull/576#issuecomment-2115510275, I am going to hold off from further making changes on this PR until the Entities SIG gets up to speed

> Given the status of Entities WG and updates to semconv, this PR can now make progress and be submitted. > > It has the following: > > 1. A...

Discussed on January 18th System Semantic Conventions WG meeting, @braydonk to update after discussion in #330

@braydonk I want to split this one, could you take a look at "no decision yet" and let me know which decisions remain to do? (I think it's both of...

I am in favor of this. > IThere's an additional state softirq, which I didn't find in the [code](https://github.com/open-telemetry/semantic-conventions/blob/4368358cdcdd78f37291317a31cbc413080738ec/model/metrics/system-metrics.yaml#L20) you referenced. @ishleenk17 I think this is Linux-specific, so it should...

Thanks, I changed all `.total` suffixes by `.limit` suffixes above :)

> Curious for next steps, will there be a PR for this change to semantic convention? @yevgentrukhin yes, this is part of the system semantic conventions WG roadmap and will...

> Clarify set of attribute values for system.memory.usage state and consider using system.memory.total I have marked this one as done, since #89 we have the the `total` value for state...

Discussed on January 18th System Semantic Conventions WG meeting, we don't consider this one to be a blocker for system metrics GA unless the new metrics affect existing metrics. @mx-psi...