momchil-flex

Thanks @QimingFlex! I think it should be possible to reuse our monitors as they are. I think you haven't yet familiarized yourself with pydantic validators, which is what we use...

Actually, on second thought I feel like everything should be handled internally. That is to say, there will be no difference in the reference frame used from the user perspective...

On the flip side though if someone is doing scattering off a Cylinder they would have to set different settings in the projection monitor (different angles, specifically) depending on which...

> Thank you for the comments, @momchil-flex ! To achieve that goal for a general case, I'm considering how to modify the monitor if we allow 0-dim for every dimension....

I am not sure this makes sense in general. Maybe for some type of nonlinearities? But generally permittivity is chi-1, and nonlinearities are higher-order-chi-s. I guess when there is no...

> in principle this is what the `Simulation.shutoff` parameter does. The problem is that in some cases the `run_time` may not be long enough, while on the other hand it's...

> What I always found confusing was why do the checking every "x"% of the total run time, instead of every "n" time steps (for example). Yeah that's probably a...

We want to have some version of this in the long run, but it is not on our road map currently. In what you want to do, can't you just...

> Thanks for your reply. Although I understand that my approach may not align with physical accuracy, I find it necessary as I utilize two monitors positioned on either side...

The images are not showing for some reason...