momchil-flex

Do we still need to keep this open @tomflexcompute ? I think MC fixed some things.

Assigned @tylerflex just so this doesn't go hanging.

> @momchil-flex I know if we need / want to have everything assigned. What makes some sense to me is we spend some time every few weeks (or after every...

If we have a metadata that can be a dict, we could put the jax_info there for adjoint simulations. That way we won't have to upload it as a separate...

I think @weiliangjin2021 should test this as part of his refactor / unification of the backend mode solver.

Are there any physical situations in which n_eff = 0 or zero-flux modes will actually need to be injected? Like, even if the fields were not NaN, it would have...

I think currently the important thing to check is that this mode can be found in the backend mode solver (and hence also in the remote once they are unified...

Now that the mode solver has been reorganized to always be the same between remote mode solver call and tidy3d internal mode solving, should we close this? @tomflexcompute @shashwat-sh @weiliangjin2021

This issue is tagged as 2.4 please someone comment on if something still needs to be done.

Ok let's do that.