Michel Loiseleur

@lyda Would you please update this PR following @jobs62 feedback ?

/retitle feat: initial OpenAPI spec for webhook provider

Wdyt about adding a few words about this in the documentation ? Otherwise, lgtm.

I have a suggestion for the title of this PR: _feat(webhooks): pass webhook-* annotations to webhook providers_

Nope. /lgtm

Mmmh, it's interesting but I'm not sure it makes sense :thinking: . Using multiple ports on the same service, on a `SRV` record, is often used to for [high availability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRV_record#Provisioning_for_high_service_availability)....

Ok. I see your point. The record format specify that the first field is supposed to be the _service_ and in Kubernetes, the port name can be a ref to...

/close

/ok-to-test

/lgtm