Michael Carroll

Which `urg_node` are you using, this one? https://github.com/bponsler/urg_node

I'm going to add a second issue to track just adding the currently missing APIs, and we can continue discussion on how to prevent this in the future on this...

Some of these changes are being brought in via #353, so I will rebase this branch after that.

I looked at this a while ago and didn't have any major objections. The size of the diff is quite substantial, so I didn't get a chance to do real...

@ros-pull-request-builder retest this please

@hgaiser and @timonegk can you take a look at the `noetic` branch? It should be compatible with both OpenCV3 as well as OpenCV4. Since I'm not officially a "maintainer" on...

@acxz I'm going to at least get it added for ROS2, since I'm maintaining that at the moment. I can't speak to the plans for ROS1 at the moment, but...

Sorry all, here is the plan moving forward: On the ROS1 side, @ahcorde is going to help out getting `vision_opencv` ready for the `noetic` release, which includes targeting Ubuntu `focal`,...

Additionally, because @vrabaud has been missing for so long, it may be time for someone to claim maintainership on the ROS1 side by following the process here: http://wiki.ros.org/MaintenanceGuide#Claiming_Maintainership @seanyen I...

> Yet cv_bridge.h (line 43) still #includes "opencv2/core/core.hpp" which throws up an error and apparently prevents building a package. `#include "opencv2/..."` is still valid, as that's what OpenCV ships. For...