Maximilian Huber comments

Results 100 comments of


                                            Maximilian Huber

There is a mixup of lines in the documentation of `image_layer.py`

The docstring is just broken. might be fixed by https://github.com/rnjudge/tern/pull/9/files#diff-7c77af6176f4142ab80d4e4b2d0b2973a3d45de2095d3deb691849e756fc981bR31-R35, but it is hard to read, so I am not sure

feat(pop): generate popularity on startup if url is not set

Oh, you require a CLA,..

feat(cli): allow to overwrite nvd cache dir

Sadly this is also not close to be finished. There are several places, where the location is hardcoded

Missing keys - rules and notifications - 2nd try

Hey @infertux, what is the state of this PR, can we help to get this merged?

ORT can not be built with Kaniko

Yes, we can close it.

apache-2.0: are there plans to handle the content of a NOTICE file?

I think this needs a new concept in the file archiver, e.g. `NoticeFilePatterns`. Their semantics are slightly different. Otherwise the copyrights in `NOTICE` are matched to the `NOTICE` and not...

would like to package - but the name is unsuitable

The package is called [spdx-tools](https://pypi.org/project/spdx-tools/) on pypi. The repo `spdx/tools-python` are the `spdx-tools` in the python universe. Does that help with your packaging. Where do you plan to package it?...

Distribution packaging

Ah, interesting. We have not yet thought about maintaining packages on top of pip. Good to know that this is right now blocking adoption. We will discuss that in our...

fix(agw): Fix for the issue related to earlier kernels as reported in #13831

> Error: Unknown scope "ovs" found in pull request title "fix(ovs): Fix for the issue related to earlier kernels as reported in #13831 ". Use one of the available scopes:...

Consider renaming tools-python to spdx-tools-python

yeah, that is a confusing situation. We are discussing how to make it clearer.