Thomas Li

It might be nice to have 1-2 jobs in the regular CI testing musllinux. The wheel builders are somewhat hard to debug if something goes wrong because they run infrequently(only...

I'm fine with adding the ppc64le wheels. Wheel building logic on travis starts here https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/2524a53ba30c1207770a27a513eb18a33837a145/.travis.yml#L53-L55 Personally, I'm not a huge fan of travis. It was causing headaches for us on...

@charris I think numpy might want to start off maybe with a kind of "best effort" support for ppc64le. This is as in, if the ppc64le wheels build, then great...

> I'm fine with adding the ppc64le wheels. Wheel building logic on travis starts here > > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/2524a53ba30c1207770a27a513eb18a33837a145/.travis.yml#L53-L55 > > Personally, I'm not a huge fan of travis. It was...

It could be that since its a two stage pipeline, and the get-commit-message part always runs, but you still get notified when the wheel builders part get skipped, since part...

@pandas-dev/pandas-core Are there any objections for the next release to be 2.0?

@charris maybe try bumping cibuildwheel to 2.9.0? Looks like py 3.11 should be supported since that release.

> There's a handful of comments `# TODO(1.4): Change me to xfails at release time`. i guess we should make that change for the 2.0 release? Those are for the...

Wheel builders are currently broken on Windows and uploads don't work on aarch. Can you give till Monday to work things out?

I have a PR open for aarch uploads but it'll take until the next nightly to verify it works.