Chen Liang
Chen Liang
It's 1.16 update time, @Dinnerbone please reconsider looking into this (given fry is looking into DFU fixes).
This is now superseded by #86
As far as I can see, the argument command nodes can be distinguished by name. https://github.com/Mojang/brigadier/blob/cf754c4ef654160dca946889c11941634c5db3d5/src/main/java/com/mojang/brigadier/tree/ArgumentCommandNode.java#L105 Afaik, the name is only used in rendering in command suggestions, like that on...
i think they will probably take it for 1.14's additional releases or more likely, 1.15 snapshots
Can't it become an info-displaying command that is bound to the node (like add this default command to all your tree nodes), so that for nodes that originally have no...
Get ird of sun.misc.Unsafe.defineClass in favor of java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.Lookup.defineClass
For now, I think making an anonymous class loader delegating to the thread context class loader to load this class might be good enough.
Get ird of sun.misc.Unsafe.defineClass in favor of java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.Lookup.defineClass
Fyi #17 mentions this because I hope #17 would support building procyon with like java 16, but it won't as this unsafe defineclass is removed before java 12.
You can just add modulo of the wanted number by 2π.
So you might consider keeping both versions for best efficiency.
I would rather let server owners define their own set of packs. IMO the core of the packs is the custom configuration files. Moreover, we might consider including mods.