Luis Enrique Muñoz Martín
Luis Enrique Muñoz Martín
Hi @MGlolenstine, glad to hear you're creating a UART adapter. I like the idea 🙌🏻. Sure it would need some kind of refactoring/redesign. I think the first question is, how...
Great! and any suggestion or other idea you feel fits better is welcome!
Hi @bkchr, the idea to be "pallet centric" is to be able to reuse the lifetime/storage of a pallet. Benefits: 1. When instantiating the mock closure, that closure must be...
Could this be implemented using `thread_local` instead of creating a pallet? Maybe, but using a pallet allows us: 1. The lifetime of the mock is the lifetime of the runtime...
Hi! I'm not maintaining `termchat` now, and I have no time to dig into it. Sorry! Nevertheless, if you or others want to dig into it and propose a fix,...
Hi @miqumi, it's very cool you use `termchat` intensively 🎉. I think the feature you propose is very useful. Nevertheless, I'm in only maintenance mode with this project. But I'll...
I see we are using Moonbeam as a dependency, but only for testing. Do we really need it? It's very painful to work with. Could we get rid of it?
I meant everything coming from Moonbeam. Are we sure we wanna tie the fudge development to different versions of Moonbean just for testing? Could we not test xcm without using...
Then, for having the XCM test, we are forced to be tied to the Moonbeam. Is there no other possibility?
> Otherwise, we'll have to use something like we had before, that mocked the whole xcm setup. And that mock reduced the coverage of the fudge code?