Luis Enrique Muñoz Martín
Luis Enrique Muñoz Martín
@cdamian I think we need your approval to get this in 💪🏻
@gpmayorga, have you checked what we need to change to avoid showing a failure in the `codecov/patch` job? Maybe just return 0 after calling tarpaulin?
Ok, now it works for all runtimes. Thanks for the help @wischli. Could we consider this ready to be merged? and leave the *99% of developers can not fix this...
**WARNING: after merging this block rewards now will use `Instance1` instead of `Instance2` in development runtime. This would imply we need to do a reset in dev/demo in the next...
I would say to open a new PR. Too many things in this one. `InitBlockRewards` migration is done each time we reset?
I want to remove the `generic` folder because after this PR is no longer needed and reestructure it a bit now . But I will wait until you get this...
Thanks William! I was wondering... if we want to avoid resetting the storage in the demo to not lose everything set. Could we instead modify the politic always to reset...
From the changes, I'm not able to know where the new six CI jobs come from. Are they internally added by the new dependencies updated?
> I think we should make them new types rather. Wdyt? Yeah, we should use different types. That was something pending I had in mind to do it. > I...