Lars Grüter

Would also be good if you could merge the recent changes from `main` into this PR branch.

I'm confused why the bot removed the dormant label again?! Anyway, @ana42742, do you want to pick this up? Otherwise, I'll assume that we can take over the next time...

Thank you for the report @glaubitz! We don't support sparc64, at least officially, so I don't know if and when someone will get around to testing that on the suggested...

Sorry for the delayed response. Yes, tests can only be run with an installed / compiled version of `scikit-image`.

See https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/blob/f5f4b0c35adab2206ff7b2b98a53c37c2acd065d/CONTRIBUTING.rst?plain=1#L517

I think we need to check and update our whole benchmarks infrastructure. I tried running a few benchmarks recently and didn't manage to get it working with the current meson-based...

Thanks for trying to fix our unique approach here. Honestly, the longer I look at this, the more I feel like we should try to come up with a non-hackish...

Oh, this should already be addressed and merged in #7463 (see https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/pull/7463#discussion_r1678135375). What I don't understand currently is why that isn't addressing your issue in https://github.com/conda-forge/scikit-image-feedstock/pull/114#issuecomment-2407429409?

Hmm, the difference might be that [`libomp` seems to be missing](https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/actions/runs/8819647825/job/24213216941#step:4:29) from the environment now ([previous job output](https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/actions/runs/8800907212/job/24153076666#step:4:21)). No idea why but might be enough to set LDFLAGS, CPPFLAGS..

This doesn't seem to be a problem anymore. Not sure why but still happy to close this. 🤷