Lorena A. Barba

> Some editors use this step to check the pdf - the problem is if they are doing this, but the AEiC is proceeding to accept, because they don't know...

Then, that calls for a reminder to handling editors of their tasks and the workflow. They should be using `@whedon check references` and `@whedon generate pdf`, then reading the paper...

Maybe the list of final checks by the handling editor, after a paper is recommended for publication by the reviewers: 1. re-generate the PDF, read paper and make any editorial...

I am inclined to say a submission that was rejected should be "brought back" by making a brand new submission. However, the submitting author should always make a reference to...

There could be a third option. Normally, you don't want to have two different behaviors occurring from clicking on the navigation (one pulling you down to the anchor, the other...

I've read in many sources that navigation menus should only point to other parts of your website, and not link out of it, and that consistency of behavior is the...

 Here's a quick mock-up of the solution I propose. Note also that I propose to change the navigation item "NumFocus" to "Fiscal...

Actually, "Open Source Initiative" is also awkward as a heading, because it appears right on top of the OSI logo saying the same thing. I would change that nav item...

I also think it's not good form to link out to a separate website (the documentation website) from the navigation menu. Nav should lead to sections _within_ the website.

The front page has a big "Documentation" button on the right. I would make "Documentation" appear similarly front-and-center on every page, and remove from the nav.