Lorena A. Barba

Thank you for the contribution, @arfon !!

If a paper to ReScience was peer-reviewed, I don't think it's proper to simply update the link on ReScience to a new version of the paper (new DOI, or new...

I don't object to it, but we should reflect a little: there may be people out there who feel there is some unfairness to the replication study getting formal publication...

Seriously? This is both interesting in its own right, and distressing. As you know, I published a paper about our own work to replicate a previous study (from our group,...

I have followed this conversation with interest. It is my assessment that replication studies in computational finance that are subject to the data restrictions discussed above are _not eligible_ to...

If ReScience is interested in using the JOSS publication workflow, I can heartily recommend it—our bot `whedon` is super-powered. Check out this one example: I published this paper today, after...

hey, @rougier -- what do you mean by "int he process of moving to JOSS infrastructure"? Are you cloning the whole tooling, and re-hosting under your own domain? Or is...

I agree this is awkward! It's even a required field when submitting; at least make it optional.

It is my understanding the the software repository should include a README with all the links to documentation, tutorials, etc. (and their completeness is part of the review). As links...

I personally send that kind of email (or sometimes contact via Twitter) to invite reviewers, and get their acceptance to serve, before tagging them in the PRE-REVIEW issue.