Krisztian Litkey
Krisztian Litkey
> @klihub @askervin should we merge this? I think we should.
> > @elezar @klihub should we also remove all deprecated APIs in v1.0.0 ? > > Yes, that sounds reasonable. Yup, we can do that, too.
> The title of this issue suggests that the scope of it is just the CDI Spec, not the API. Is it still the case? Then again, some of the...
> So, we need to either update the issue title or the TODO list. I'd say it's probably safer to update the TODO list as it will reduce amount of...
> [@elezar](https://github.com/elezar) [@klihub](https://github.com/klihub) There are already quite a bit of changes between main branch and the latest release: > > ``` > $ git diff v0.8.0 | wc -l >...
> @elezar @klihub I thought that we agreed to introduce validator package as a separate PR, no? That was also my understanding.
One of the tests is failing now (TestCacheWriteSpec/multiple_spec_files/data,_some_invalid).
> @klihub @elezar thank you for your patience on the crio work. We had some long lasting bugs around our CI images. this actually helped get a PR I had...
@ngopalak-redhat @askervin This looks a bit off. Are you sure this really works ? I think the resolution algorithm should be different depending on whether the runtime is using the...
/cc @askervin PTAL