Adrien Grand

FWIW I have started looking at applying @PSeitz 's approach: https://github.com/quickwit-oss/search-benchmark-game/compare/master...jpountz:search-benchmark-game:filtered_queries?expand=1 in case you want to take a look (the query parsing bits are still missing).

Can you explain a bit more what you have in mind? It was convenient to avoid introducing a third column in the protocol that src/client.py uses to submit queries to...

@PSeitz I looked into your suggestion, but having different formats in the queries.txt and the results file while doing the conversion in `src/client.py` looks a bit awkward. It's possible that...

I'm unsure about this PR for a few reasons: 1. It sounds relatively easy to do on the application side by using `Sort` factories that can either produce a `Sort`...

Thinking a bit more about it, adding `searchBefore` sounds like it could work. Would you like to give it a try?

I understand why you are trying to measure CPU time, but it would have other issues. E.g. it would not report issues if `IndexSearcher#slices` or the merge policy somehow create...

> Also, ConcurrentSortedSetDocValuesFacetCounts takes its own ExecutorService It also creates one task per segment instead of reusing the `IndexSearcher` slices, which would be nice to fix too. (More generally, I...

I have had many discussions on this topic of file format bw compat over the years, because users would ideally like to think of their indexes as never expiring. If...

Indeed it likely does, can you merge main back into your branch?

I would backport as it looks pretty safe, though I doubt we have anyone using this postings format, so it likely doesn't matter much in practice.