jeffjaffe

> I would prefer to frame this as "Single implementations and interoperability: showing implementation experience with fewer implementations" or the like. Done.

This should really be looked at more in the context of director-free.

I agree that we need to be careful about appearances so I support limiting each organization to a maximum of one vote per council.

As an fyi, the Team often delays Workshops because of the MUST requirement. While there are workarounds, often stakeholders really want a Workshop and the process language is effective in...

Thanks Florian, for refocusing on recusals. I have a different set of observations from the experiment. I had planned to make those observations in the experiment post-mortem, but as long...

> That's why we set the _automatic_ obligatory recusals so narrow. Perhaps we should explain this more around the 'may recuse'. Just be clear, I think we have set the...

> The Director has or had a COI when ruling on matters that affected his personal area of research or startup, for example. It was appropriate for the Founding Director...

At the experiment debrief I pointed out that potential Council Members who work for companies who have a strong business interest in the results of the objection should be required...

@frivoal the problem with countering "bias" with "a large and diverse group" is that this large group still can be homogeneous with respect to certain objectors. As you point out,...

> The harm is that you still have not defined who judges what constitutes "strong" so it's subjective. As you know we discussed some of the objective criteria at the...