jeffjaffe

> I trust that W3C team will see that, and take note We see it. We took note. We are working on improvements.

> you're considered inactive after one year of lack of participation? We should be careful about giving an AC rep the "label" of inactive. I assume that even if an...

I note that most who have posted here are fairly active. It would be worthwhile, specifically for this issue, to hear more from Members who are less active.

I would like to propose a different, hopefully cleaner approach to this problem. As I understand it, the problem is that some thresholds are too low. They would make sense...

Sorry, Mike. Our practice is made up of a collection of documents and indeed can be hard to find on a quick scan. Section 6.2.3 of the process document is...

It's fine to call it process project management. Question is to find the right "hook" for that in director-free. Today, the hook is that the Director will not approve transitions...

I think that @mnot raises an important question. The Team would be foolish to introduce processes without member review and acceptance. I believe that CGs and BGs have been discussed...

Linking this to the previous attempt: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/358

I was asked by the Chair to comment on this pull request. My comments were already made on issue #281 before #281 got moved here. They can be found in...

@frivoal , rather than address your entire post which sometimes characterizes my position and sometimes doesn't, I would prefer to address what I think is the substantive piece: > You...