jeffjaffe

We have several mechanisms for things to be published. Included in that are Member submissions; Notes; CG reports; and of course the REC track. What are examples of documents for...

> I think that for single-vendor disclosures, we should probably set a policy about IPR and licensing: probably that the vendor explicity declare or attach what the terms are. I...

> * I hear stories of other SDOs / OSS projects seeking an MoU with W3C and got ignored by W3M. @michaelchampion I would appreciate - perhaps privately - a...

I question whether the patent policy should have precedence over the process. When we eliminated "Last Call" from the process (circa 2014?), we did not want to change the PP....

> > When we eliminated "Last Call" from the process (circa 2014?), we did not want to change the PP. So in the process, we defined CR to be Last...

> I am pretty sure that a document that puts legal obligations on members takes precedence over something that puts procedural requirements on them, and that PSIG would agree. Terrific!!...

Providing the current public speaking guidelines for reference: https://www.w3.org/2014/01/PSGMatrix This also relates to #429

> Imagine 3 opportunities to review the charter instead of 1.... > > If a wg asks 3 times for a review, and the reviewers still don't have time... they...

> E.g. the WHATWG MOU etc was more political handholding than actually necessary for any participation/work in practice. This is a pretty disappointing assessment. W3C and WHATWG had struggled for...

A feature of the process is to allow the Director to apply judgment rather than rigorously defining every term. The problem with the latter is that it sometimes locks you...