jeffjaffe

It requires AC approval to charter new work. If some stakeholders believe that a charter does not fit the mission and values of W3C, they would object (this has happened...

> Just make it a secret ballot vote by the AC to approve a charter or not. I don't think that a secret ballot vote by the AC is an...

Although I personally was comfortable with closing this issue - seeing that several people do not agree - I think we need to leave it open.

@chaals I would appreciate if you could clarify what you mean when you say that "proposals that can get a formal objection are made in the name of W3C". For...

If we require a complete test suite at CR Entry, there is an important side-benefit. Once implementations arrive, it can make the process of going from CR to REC much...

I support the general direction for a Directorate. Since Mike made the original proposal in September of last year, we have run an experiment of the W3C Council, for a...

> Likewise, although I think I see the implications - the TAG and the AB each elect two members plus two alternates, but you don't explicitly state they elected them...

> I think that there are some serious problems here. One of the criteria would be willingness to serve; I would not volunteer to handle every FO in the course...

> I think David's point was more "companies that are in a position to implement, but would explicitly choose not to, but are not the source of the FO". E.g.,...

> Then I think you're missing the point. The recusal rule would allow all the entities that bitterly oppose something to serve on the Directorate, and ban all those who...