Ian Chen
Ian Chen
> However, as Gazebo also got the option of defining named frames, it would be useful to get these transferred to ROS, too. In past projects we used the [pose_publisher](https://github.com/gazebosim/gz-sim/tree/gz-sim9/src/systems/pose_publisher)...
created a draft PR in https://github.com/gazebosim/ros_gz/pull/703 for the solution proposed in https://github.com/gazebosim/gz-sensors/issues/488#issuecomment-2649312331
> @iche033, I believe I addressed all your comments. If you agree with the proposed changes, could you please approve #2787 before? I would like to rebase this PR after...
> Besides the dependency that prevents the proper CI checks, though, there are still some unresolved threads here from your first pass review, are those solved? yep looks good to...
@mergify backport gz-sim8
> After I changed the value such as cubeUVTexture width and height, LiDAR ray showed a weird value than I expected. We don't have documentation for creating custom ray shapes....
sounds like https://github.com/gazebosim/gz-sim/issues/1958. My answer would be the same as the comment: https://github.com/gazebosim/gz-sim/issues/1958#issuecomment-1499032276. Someone also posted in that issue another GPU based lidar implementation that you can check out.
the Examples test failure is unrelated, and should be fixed by https://github.com/gazebosim/gz-sim/pull/2649
sure! please go ahead
just double checking, for 1), have you tried running the simulation by clicking the Play button on the bottom left of the window? As for 2), what's the directory that...