Hennadii Stepanov
Hennadii Stepanov
Concept ACK on increasing performance.
> I tried for quite some time to get this to work using `CTEST_TEST_TIMEOUT` from within _CMakeLists.txt_ but it does not appear to be possible. According to CMake docs, [`CTEST_TEST_TIMEOUT`](https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/variable/CTEST_TEST_TIMEOUT.html)...
I don't think that enabling CET for GCC alone will work. Shouldn't `binutils` and `glibc` also be CET-enabled?
> > will work. > > What do you mean by "work" here? By "work" I mean producing x86_64 binaries with the `IBT` and `SHSTK` markers in the `.note.gnu.property` section.
> > Shouldn't binutils ... also be CET-enabled? > > What is a CET-enbled binutils? Configured with `--enable-cet` option. > If you mean it supporting CET functionality, then it is...
> I don't think we need to do anything here In the current state, the statement from the PR description: > CET is enabled on Linux/x86 is not accurate.
> The point of this PR has never been to add any additional metadata to the binaries/make any other changes, the point is just to explictly use the hardening option...
> Transations were updated for 28.x in #30715. > > Looks like that update pulled in things that are not translations. i.e: > > https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/e43ce250c6fb65cc0c8903296c8ab228539d2204/src/qt/locale/bitcoin_gl_ES.ts#L6 > > ? This is...
> This requires providing a "Fusion manifest for an unpackaged Win32 app", whatever that means, if we can even do this with mingw32. I believe we can use an approach...
> Great, good to know that's possible. i guess by the time we switch to C++26 and this becomes a blocking issue, it will be fine to require a 2019...