Gary Gregory
Gary Gregory
This won't happen until master switches to 2.0 and changes the package name which will break this PR. Until then, we could split up this project into a multi-module component,...
@elharo Please rebase on `master`.
Well, I have no plans ATM to do so. But... if we release a new version that breaks binary compatibility, then we will have to change the package name and...
Since the tests fail, please decorate the methods with @Ignore("COLLECTIONS-714")
@rohanpadhye You are not mistaken indeed. Commons Collections needs a port to JUnit 4 for `@Ignore` to to work properly. We cannot merge this patch as is since it will...
> You can add a prefix of X for those test cases as the JUnit will be looking for the methods starting with test. Don't do that, that's why one...
Some of this PR is likely obsolete due to the newer PathUtils delete methods. Please review these and perhaps propose enhancements?
Hi All, For the basic operations, please use version 2.7's `IOExceptionList` and `PathUtils` methods: - `delete(Path)` - `delete(Path, DeleteOption...)` - `deleteDirectory(Path)` - `deleteDirectory(Path, DeleteOption...)` - `deleteFile(Path)` - `deleteFile(Path, DeleteOption...)` WRT:...
@jvz Nice idea Matt :-) let's discuss on the ML where a retry API belongs.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 10:57 AM Matt Sicker wrote: > Breaking up into execution strategies sounds like a good idea! Such a > strategy could likely adopt a...