Vlad Frolov

> The implementation seems to be a bit faster as well. It is faster because you changed the algorithm of the `Contains` implementation. I will only be able to merge...

I like your API design. I think most of the naive implementations (in other languages) would also benefit in readability if apply this design. Currently, most of the naive implementations...

> I guess the solution would be to not restrict solutions to an API with the actual object and method names. Well, this is a double-edged sword. Having all solutions...

@silkeh Thank you for your contribution! I have no estimated time when I will get back to this benchmark, but once that happens, I will surely take this PR into...

I encourage you to play with the solutions on your own computer and you can even fork or create your own benchmark from scratch! While I agree that it is...

It is a completely unscientific benchmark. My initial goal was to compare naïve implementations of exactly the same problem in different languages. This benchmark is good enough for me, and...

We have no experience with Scala, so if someone is willing to help us, that would be helpful.

@giiita if that is the idiomatic way to implement it in Scala, go for it. If that is "optimization", it will end up on the tuned scoreboard.

Could you also consider the use-case where you need to have different filters for different writers? I want to report only WARN+ logs in human-readable format to stderr while writing...

I have no idea why this may happen. I can only suggest using OpenJDK compiled for musl libc.