Edward Wallace

Ok, now we have the `display_plate` function created, is this still something we want to / could / should do?

Added helper functions to address this in commit 8a7e4d7, display_plate helpers, fixes #74 To be merged soon.

Oh dear, I didn’t realise `do()` was superseded! That is a very nice function. Low priority though, if it works?

I have recently tried to look at this in other situations, and even though `do()` is superseded I still find it more intuitive in some situations.

Update: [dplyr::summarise now allows return of data frames](https://dplyr.tidyverse.org/reference/summarise.html). That means that we would be able to replace `do` calls with `summarise` calls, and update dplyr dependency to v1.0.0 or later.

Hello @MichalLauer - yes this issue is still relevant. I'm just reviewing and updating tidyqpcr. Currently `do()` still works, and is not generating warnings, but, it's still superseded. I'm flagging...

That is a very nice idea.

I will start working on this, following the checklist above. @j-aux will send example code for writing out the plate plan to QuantStudio format.

I agree this would be good. Let's design an experiment for this, just 2 conditions, 3 tech reps, 2 bio reps (or more), correct controls, that fits on a 96-well...

Reminder that we should design an experiment for this. We might even be able to ask @j-aux really nicely and she might do that experiment.