Esteban Kuber comments

Results 157 comments of


                                            Esteban Kuber

#95295 causes unsoundness in multiple existing crates

> @estebank do you think we can remove also T-compiler or better keep them in the loop? Better to leave it. The team can remove it ourselves on the next...

Make stderr output more copy-friendly

I agree that this is a case of "the browser and GH being too smart by half", but I'm seeing the effects it's having on our tickets. Sadly any solution...

Add diagnostic for calling a function with the same name with unresolved Macro

r=me after https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103185 lands and this is rebased

Add diagnostic for calling a function with the same name with unresolved Macro

@bors r+

Improve diagnostics like "incompatible types: expected fn item, found a different fn item"

We should in [every E0308](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=36e5b62a7d83f3891fdb077b3fe3c1a2) explain that different functions have distinct types, and how to cast them to a fn pointer. (I thought we were doing that already. :-/ )

Improve diagnostics like "incompatible types: expected fn item, found a different fn item"

@compiler-errors that makes sense. We might get away with only supporting the simple case of reference to `fn` like in the OP. For more complex cases we might get over...

Resolve $crate at the expansion-local crate

r? @petrochenkov

most `borrowck` diagnostic migration

Please run `x.py fmt`

Would it be possible for racer to integrate with rustdoc?

I have a small hacked together version of this, I'll be sending a pull request later today. I noticed that for some reason in HEAD `complete-with-snippets` is returning the same...

Tracking issue for box_syntax

> The alternative that I could think of would be a lang-item function like `Box::new_in_place` or a free function `alloc::boxed::box_in_place` with its own feature gate. What do people think? @est31...