Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden

> Moving back to draft because it needs some installer work as well before we can proceed. @ehelms opened https://github.com/theforeman/foreman-installer/pull/1012.

Rebased without change, but now the installer is updated. I think this should only go in nightly unless we decide to cherry pick the installer patch as well.

Trivial rebase done.

> Merged to "master". No cherry-picks necessary according to `foreman-installer`: Technically I think `--contains` only looks at merges and won't spot cherry picks because those commits have a different commit...

I think this is questionable. For example, things may change in the procedure (because they happen in a non-deprecated part). That makes it harder to follow. While this may be...

> Can you show us a real example? Why would anyone update or change a procedure when the feature is deprecated? See [Registering hosts with bootstrap script](https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_satellite/6.15/html-single/managing_hosts/index#Registering_Hosts_by_Using_the_Bootstrap_Script_managing-hosts). It has steps...

Would it make sense to add notes to procedures that are deprecated?

> The procedure already has a deprecation notice. I am proposing that the procedure be removed completely and replaced with (a) deprecation notice and (b) link to procedure in an...

> I'd only include a note for Satellite and orcharhino if it has been removed from Foreman nightly I disagree with this. Some features are big and sometimes users need...

I don't think I've seen "ReX" before, pretty sure it's always simply "REX". If you really want to be fussy, wouldn't it be "REx"? Though that also looks odd to...