David Singer
David Singer
I sort-of agree with both. "Have you asked the AB for help, and if not, try that" is fine – but it's not a final stop-gap, definitive, "this is the...
> We need to be able to distinguish the scenarios: > > 1. A Proposal was assessed and rejected, so the group chose no Decision. > 2. No formal assessment...
If we focus on the initial question as @samuelweiler suggests > I propose that we focus on the example in the opening message, namely chartering. For existing groups, the group...
I agree, I see neither urgency to change nor forceful reasons for the current text. If the AB did not have a formal vote, it still has influence: talk to...
There has been quite a lot of effort on re-organizing and limited re-writing over the last few years; we realized that the document had grown in an organic way and...
I think we should address incumbent bias, but I don't think term limits are a good tool. I am also sad that we didn't elect new people. Both the organization...
@marcoscaceres The counterpoint to what you're saying is that handling the process, being involved in AC Forum discussions that relate to governance, and so on, are _part of_ being on...
@marcoscaceres I think we have a problem here: my perception is that candidates who don't become visible either in their current role (e.g. as AC Rep, as a Chair presenting...
I have a procedural concern with term limits (in general); in politics I observe that often people vote both for term limits and their long-standing incumbent, so I am led...
I think Michael's proposal strikes a reasonable balance.