David Singer
David Singer
> Could you provide a pointer please? (Verbal in the AB meeting at least)
> OK, thanks. It looks like there is not yet a summary of the most recent AB meeting, which I understand was earlier this week. > > In lieu of...
> > that (as far as I know) no-one has said > > @dwsinger it was you who said it had been said, in [#651 (comment)](https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/651#issuecomment-1333968467) - I accept that...
Let's see. "mob" is a pejorative term, implying people who are uninformed and out with pitchforks, which you further emphasize with "uninterested". Take the possibility that a WG is straying...
I think we're seriously off track here. We **already have** the possibility that the Director can close a group prematurely. We're moving to a member-led consortium, and it seems imprudent...
> > We **already have** the possibility that the Director can close a group prematurely. > > Yes, in very [specific prescribed conditions](https://www.w3.org/2021/Process-20211102/#GeneralTermination), rather than by an AC Review or...
I think we will need to address the question of whether the AC Review of a contract is definitive, either way. If a contract is proposed, and the AC says...
is this different from #560 ?
Perhaps I am opening a can of worms, but SMPTE clearly distinguishes the status of a member submission from work initiated and done at the consortium. They call theirs "Registered...
@tabatkins sounds good. If the word can be configured to be Appendix or Annex I think that works. I wondered about two classes e.g. `Some Notes` and `Some Notes` but...