David Singer

The AB usually gets a report prepared by Ralph; it takes a little while, and given how overloaded Ralph is right now, it may take longer. If I recall correctly,...

I think we wanted, at least for a while, to differentiate Registries (as defined in the Process) from registries that are already being run on previous un-definitions, that's all. So,...

Work can leave a working group because it's discontinued (and removed from the next charter), or transferred to another WG (and maybe other ways). I am unconvinced that requiring the...

> the W3C should a priori welcome new projects driven by its members, unless: > > 1. deliverables will necessarily and demonstrably conflict with the mission, scope or process of...

I'm fairly sure we shouldn't have restrictive rules on what can be referenced. I suppose that there could be inappropriate references but I can't think of an example. But clearly...

We don't normally re-approve referencing documents when we make a normative change to a basis document. Being aware of the dependencies when we approve a change is, of course, best...

I also think it peculiar that we use a structure open to the public. A TF of the AB, open to members, would seem much better.

I would prefer to define liaison relationship as something which gives and grants rights, has a process for establishing, and so on. Have a look at [ISO/IEC liaisons](https://www.iso.org/sites/directives/current/consolidated/index.html#_Toc134090804); there are...

agreed, the table should not be in the process. but it existing is good

It has been suggested that it should be possible for the community to cause an WG closure vote to happen; I suggest that we should similarly make it possible to...