David Singer

It doesn't create a conflict at all. They report the facts and background, their attempts to find a consensus solution, and, if they can and wish, what they think may...

@palemieux The team is not "arguing against a member". This not _not_ a court of law, and we arrived at an FO because there was a difficult conflict between members...

um, a limit is a prevention. If the team has a recommendation, then the Council will get to know it; it's best if it's in the report for all to...

At the moment, we hire technical experts on the team. True, they no longer write code or specs, but they are deeply involved in technical direction. You might envisage that...

The Bylaws clearly have precedence. They are a formal construct. And we don't want the more formal Bylaws drawing from the less formal Process either, hence where we are.

Yes, please. But also, maybe we can phrase it so we don't get into violation territory. Something like that the AB should identify up to two liaisons, who the AB...

Just write the proposed text, and send it to Mark Nottingham and Koichi Moriyama as chairs of the Governance Committee, for them to handle in GovCom and the Board. With...

Not quite meaningless. Establishing that the AB can, and how it does, decide who would be offered to the Board as liaison makes some sense.

@frivoal I don't think the Process can alter the Bylaws. So either we're asking the Board to invite these people, or asking the Board to modify the bylaws, or starting...

The process can define that the AB offers liaisons to the Board and how they are chosen. The Bylaws can, at some point, be revised to say something vague about...