David Singer
David Singer
I suspect the existence of the clause makes it unlikely to be used; 'agree, or the team will step in and appoint'
I think we should keep the fallback. (And fix the typo, chose->choose "Participants in the TAG chose by consensus their Chair or co-Chairs")
I think 30 days is a fine number to require a status update (we need to say from when; from when it was formally convened, I think)
I'm not in favor of a hard deadline for a decision, but perhaps after a certain time has expired, there are people who can insist on a decision?
astonishingly, the process says nothing at all about _processing_ FOs, only about recording and reporting them. We probably need a short section somewhere. I'd rather not deprecate; when we go...
OK by me. Please suggest (asap) text!
the process CG is open to suggestions -- Ralph, do you have proposed text?
we need proposed text, or this risks being closed/no-action. @swickr
we can't say that the team can make Editorial changes because a Note is entirely Editorial (against the formal definition). see #536 and #28 still need a proposed change…
deleting "in pursuit of its mission" would seem fine by me, it adds nothing to the document.