David Singer
David Singer
Yes, I do. The playing field of formal objections is already tilted against the minority player. We should be ready to listen to a lone voice, and not set the...
> WG tend to know in advance where strong disagreements lay and they can't be truly surprised by a FO if they followed the review process all the way. Sometimes,...
Reminder: not all decisions are required to be backed by consensus. Indeed, one possible ground for an FO is that there should have been consensus and it was not, in...
A situation we were keen to avoid was requiring super-majority to make any decision, as that could leave us decision-free indefinitely. I agree, that "in the case of a vote,...
They can always get a vote; the requirement is based on those not dismissed or renouncing, and excludes abstains. Whether they'd _like_ to issue a decision if many also abstain...
Given that member submissions are rare, and that this will always be a judgment call, and that a 'poor decision' could be appealed, we're not making this a priority…
It may be helpful to notice the date on [these appointments](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2013AprJun/0026.html).
At the August F2F the sense of the AB was that there should be a limit on the number of consecutive appointed terms (probably 2), and that a person can...
@frivoal I made a note that it was said and not disagreed with, but whether it was agreed with I cannot say. Probably a Discuss point.
The specific question on whether one is required to stand for election to be eligible for appointment to a second term filed in #622