Daniel Marjamäki
Daniel Marjamäki
> And as I said - if the string is not terminated or the size is wrong you will have the same issues. If you are coming from a raw...
> Please give me a bit to implement the approach yeah sure feel free to look at a better approach. However in my humble opinion we need to make simplecpp...
> An unnecessary wrapper (i.e. copy) and not sure what is going on with non-ASCII data. That's what I want to look into. About the copy I don't care about...
> This is a not a big performance problem. If I put on the Cppcheck hat for a little moment.. I have the feeling that the Tokenizer in Cppcheck could...
> The speed of that is fine (except for some extreme cases) thanks.. I measured now again.. I thought it was way worse for some reason.
> There is also https://github.com/danmar/simplecpp/issues/279 regarding performance which is a much more general issue. interesting. I wonder if you have ever profiled simplecpp in windows. A customer has reported that...
Clang/GCC doesn't implement their checkers properly... Code 1: ``` void dostuff(double x); void f() { dostuff(0.1f); } ``` Clang says: ``` test1.c:5:13: warning: implicit conversion increases floating-point precision: 'float' to...
> In that case please file an upstream report. Nah, I doubt they would care about it.
> Well, you might not imagine. They have that 100%. Yes I have seen it myself also.
thanks.. my problem with this is that I don't like the rule files and would rather like to get rid of this old mistake. It's not hard to implement it...