Daniel Marjamäki
Daniel Marjamäki
It's almost good to merge this. do you think you might finish this?
> Build systems (minimum): Imho, we do not need to support very old tools. If somebody has a 10+ year old system he/she can still build the command line tool...
> very outdated versions for production stuff has security implications which would prevent you from actually running such binaries the users I have talked with can't upgrade so easily. especially...
> Cppcheck is a dev tool which is meant to run in the dev environment not the the really old production systems that a user maybe targeting. yes. I agree....
> This would not be a list of "supported" platforms but "tested" ones IMO. Like the minimum supported version of GCC 4.6 but that probably hasn't worked in years and...
> That doesn't even supported C++11 at all I think - that probably hasn't been working in like longer than GCC 4.6 hasn't. I compiled the democlient with gcc-4.4 until...
> I tried that with #3545 but that system lacks symbols which are necessary to be run within the CI. And I guess it will be some work to get...
> If they are able to build/compile programs as a workaround, then why dont they build a newer gcc? I am not sure what effort that is but I would...
> Furthermore, cppcheck is a 100% volunteer effort. If companies are making it so difficult for developers to have a productive dev environment then they should be investing either money,...
> On Ubuntu 16.04 is is not possible to build the GUI with CMake I don't have any issues dropping support for GUI in Ubuntu 16.04. > I really think...