Daniel S. Katz

@labarba - I don't have a problem with those links, but out of curiosity, how would you change the page?

Thanks - though I continue to disagree. I don't think documentation is a useful word here, at least compared to "for reviews" or "for authors". I wonder if there's a...

The idea of how to store citation metadata is in flux, but codemeta.json is closer to where I think we will end up than citation.cff

I don't think there's any option. Based on where you have the figure reference in the text (near the end of the first page), the figure cannot go on the...

I talked with a member of their team yesterday, which is why this came up. But to add ourselves, we don't need to talk to them; there's a fairly clear...

It was suggested to me that we could use some portion of [OJS](https://openjournalsystems.com/ojs-download/) to do this. OJS is a complete system, and I was told that some journals have pulled...

we are now [listed in BASE](https://www.base-search.net/Record/333472af86e406ad200ae5fc57aa6511643fd6c9ad42d3f5640e782489ce3143/) because it picks up DOAJ, where we are also listed. However, our submissions don't seem to be indexed in either.

We don't always have full names to go along with github handles for reviewers, but we do always have them for editors. Having said that, I didn't notice this before...

In my opinion, all of the people who contributed to the work to be published (the software project and the paper) should agree on who should be authors.

In terms of your indirect contributions, my personal opinion (not a JOSS opinion) is that, by itself: - giving feedback on the manuscript may not be sufficient to be an...