Daniel S. Katz

Thanks @knepley While I somewhat agree with your point that most projects apply for grants together with people using the software, there also is a fair amount of funding that...

Thanks - I think this is a good idea. Perhaps it should be in-kind support? Would you want to put in a PR to add this as a model?

@afrodri - this is just a ping to see if you would be willing to add this via a pull request, since I think it's a good concept that should...

I completely agree - that would be great! Do you think a structural change/addition now could help encourage people to contribute to this, in this way? If so, would you...

note that JOSS does not currently aim at FAIR, for one reason since there is no community-accepted definition of what FAIR means for software.

Correct, the review would fail. Reviewers (particularly in a discipline) should be able to make judgement. For example, astronomy image processing software that writes our files in some new format...

I think we need to make this a little more specific, perhaps something like "without registration other than as needed on community-accepted coding platforms (e.g. GitHub, GitLab)" I'm not sure...

I almost want to suggest a process for inviting reviewers that includes something like: @whedon check username as reviewer (note not tagging the potential reviewer yet) which would return the...

While I generally would prefer authors to submit preprints and to link to them rather than citing vague "in submission" papers, I also don't think we can require it, since...

Sorry for the false assignment, but I would appreciate thoughts from @kyleniemeyer @kthyng @labarba and @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, and any interested editors