Daniel McCarney

I think I just bumped into this using `DNS_TEST_PEER="hickory"` with the conformance testing `explore.rs` example w/ `unbound` acting as the recursive resolver (More debugging context [in this Discord thread](https://discord.com/channels/590067103822774272/1400141201134321844)). In...

> This one is the most important. Reqwest may not be able to use the builder API without this change. (I am not a request author, so I can't speak...

> @cpu want to take a look? Yes, thanks for the ping. I will look in the next day or so.

Thanks for opening an issue, > CertifiedKey reads like "a key that is (somehow) certified" That's an accurate reading from my perspective. An X.509 certificate binds a public key with...

> Looks like the rustdoc should be phrased as such then. Sounds reasonable! Want to open a PR?

> I also like to include a UserNotice about explicit distrust towards a certificate in those I use for development It seems to me that if your test environment doesn't...

> I can't use the subject details / distinguished name since it's subject to the DirectoryName NameConstraints. I imagine you could adjust the constraints in the test certificate to match...

I was looking at adapting some of the test cases from [rustls/webpki](https://github.com/rustls/webpki) to x509-limbo, but it looks like most of our [interesting testcases](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/tree/main/tests/crls) are just bare DER that we cooked...

> cpu added the Proposal label 1 hour ago Apologies, it wasn't clear which new issue flow to use for this issue and when I selected proposal it added this...

All required ACVP support has been merged in-tree :tada: