Daniel McCarney
Daniel McCarney
> Got that. It's a pity that rustls team is totally ok with regressions like that As explained in the linked issues we don't think it's a regression. It's a...
As best I can tell there's no way to use the workaround with `ureq` without changing the code of `ureq`, but maybe a maintainer of this crate will have an...
@algesten That summary looks right to me. Notably v1 certificates can't have extensions, which precludes things like Subject Alternative Names. > @cpu what are the dangers (if any) of using...
> aws-lc-rs might even be ok in the short term. But I am personally highly skeptical of the team developing it. They have https://github.com/rustls/rustls/issues/1913 a general disinterest of working with...
> I'd love to hear if any users of ureq have thoughts on this. @algesten I think if you were happy with `*ring*` as your default before today it's reasonable...
> @cpu on a side note. I only today discovered Graviola. It looks interesting! Do you have any insights/thoughts to share about the future of that library? Just my solo...
> Do we want to backport this to 0.103.x? I don't think it's important enough to justify the work personally.
> These now come from IANA, with significant filtering. Out of curiosity, was this manual or programmatic?
> This also breaks binaries newly built. I need to add some commands manually to set per-process crypto provider @JakkuSakura I don't think this is related to the topic of...
I think the direction of C2SP/wycheproof has been clarified at this point.