Ben Smith

Added some steps, but I'm sure I'm missing things.

I agree that using the `meetings` repo for notes for all subgroups sounds good. So as a next step, are there notes that are currently in other repos that should...

That works for me. I think it's nice to see all the meetings flattened out into one list too, but we can still do that in the top-level `README.md`, as...

> I guess my takeaway here is that we need to be mindful of minimum useful functionality not just when we create new proposals but also when we split things...

Thanks for writing this up! I'll add this to the agenda for discussion in the [next meeting](https://github.com/WebAssembly/meetings/blob/master/2020/CG-01-21.md). If you are a CG member, feel free to join the meeting to...

You can join the CG here, if you like: https://www.w3.org/community/webassembly. We ask that people join the group if they'd like to attend the meetings. Otherwise, you can read the meeting...

We discussed this in the [Jan 21 CG meeting](https://github.com/WebAssembly/meetings/blob/master/2020/CG-01-21.md#meeting-notes). In general, folks were in favor of doing this. We discussed a bit and decided we'd try to determine how to...

Agreed, looks good.

It looks like the other charters are their own repos under WebAssembly. [cg-charter](https://github.com/WebAssembly/cg-charter) and [wg-charter](https://github.com/WebAssembly/wg-charter). Not sure if it makes sense to do the same, however.

> In the specific case of table.fill and the ref types proposal, this would have resulted in us dropping the table.fill instruction and advancing the proposal to the next phase....