Thomas Beutlich

@HansOlsson @sjoelund Can you please regenerate the class coverage based on MSL v4.0.0-beta.2? Thanks.

Thanks a lot for the information.

> I have attached the log. It's also available [here](https://gistpreview.github.io/?ef7741a7e8cc8949debbc684573d3086) directly in browser.

> > > And simple text format would be sufficient for the post-processing application. Sorted by names or by number of occurences (as https://test.openmodelica.org/libraries/MSL_trunk/Coverage.txt does)? (By the way, that MSL_trunk...

> The file itself is based on an 11 day old MSL Cannot believe it, since there no longer is Modelica.SIunits in MSL.

> I reran `ModelManagement.Check.checkLibrary(false, condCov=false, styleCheck=false, name="Modelica", testFileDirectory="ModelicaTest", filter=true, localCoverage=true, translationStructure=false);` on trunk. Which for our code required some conversions of additional libraries [modelica/Modelica_LinearSystems2#72](https://github.com/modelica/Modelica_LinearSystems2/pull/72) Coming from #4684 I reran that...

What is a -v5.mat file according to this table: https://github.com/tbeu/matio/ ?issues/154#issuecomment-694923374 ? Can you add the MAT-file here?

Would be interesting how the MAT-file was created by which tool/framework/library. Would also be interesting if MATLAB can load that MAT-file? Generally speaking, it does not matter which version the...

That error "InflateData: inflate returned data error" normally indicates some file format violation. But could be a ModelicaMatio issue if the MAT-file was created by MATLAB. W/o the file it's...

Yes, I can help for the technical stuff, but I cannot answer the questions on usefulness and interest.