Antonio Vivace

> No, it's a desktop program. You can't compile GBDK projects in the browser, though. Then I guess that is quite a unique feature we should consider (the fact that...

We should take advantage of this to fix #124 and properly reorganize that content

A nice resource indeed, but I don't think that is supposed to be a tutorial at all. There's source, and a one hour general commentary on the development. Maybe it...

This is cool! I'm late to the party but I'd very much like to see this in the list. @ISSOtm observations are on point and he raised some clear issues....

Do we have any update on this, @joeldipops ? This also looks interesting: https://github.com/joeldipops/TransferBoy

> I have made quite a few improvements to it, especially based on your and ISSOtm's advice. Great! I really appreciate you sticking with it and working on feedbacks. >...

Hi @leefogg and thanks for the feedback. At the moment, the EMULATORS.md does not require any minimum level of "quality" of the contents it lists, while the Emulators chapter in...

How can you define "truthful"? Are we gonna check every documentation file and run tests on the proposed emulator?

Nothing "runs every game perfectly", apart from the Game Boy itself, so that kind of proposal is excluded anyway. IMO we have to rethink about that list, and decide if...

Why? What's the advantage of fragmenting something that has the same scope (curated list of resources related to gb/gbdev)? Can't we outline a process for different kind of resource in...