Vince Broz

Thanks for the report! I wouldn't be surprised if this is related to zeroed out prevalence data from upstream for the area. Here's some context here around the problem, with...

If someone would be so kind as to do a quick spot check of some type on the translations that were crowd-sourced here, I'd be happy to merge this. I'm...

@Bastette54: I think I would try to bucket my scenarios into separate scenarios of smaller groups of people in different mask categories and add up the microCOVIDs. Have you tried...

Thanks for the idea, @Bastette54! If someone wants to look into this, let's talk through the approach. We'd of course need to get the right research integrated into the model...

@turtlecrk: Thanks for reporting this! I think the reason for this is that microCOVID tries not to be too optimistic and so doesn't use negative trends to project ahead and...

Sounds like this one is resolved to the extent we can control it.

I'd generally advocate for assuming in reporting to the user in this situation that the data reflects a lack of reporting from upstream - in that sense it is "correct",...

Generalizing this a bit, it'd be nice to extend this concept out two ways: 1. Handle any level of place which has previously reported (any of the three levels -...

Hi @velocitybucket! Sorry for the slow reply - we've been a little [light on contributors lately](https://github.com/microCOVID/microCOVID/discussions/1626). If you're interested in digging in on this with me on a Zoom call...

Thanks, @VvMarciaL! There's been a new model which would account for recency of latest booster. We're looking for help to integrate that new model into microCOVID: * https://github.com/microCOVID/microCOVID/discussions/1626