Vince Broz

@seamusabshere @rubemz @itspriddle let me know if you're interested in this PR and perhaps a new maintainer; I almost have the patch ready.

Hi @seamusabshere @rubemz @itspriddle - pinging on this.

Oh, and please take for granted that if something isn't marked as assigned, PRs are definitely welcome (and probably even when they're marked as assigned, frankly) :)

Gotcha! I would recommend for that type of check ("I want to ratchet down the number of files over a certain size"), you use RuboCop with the quality gem. RuboCop...

I think what you're saying is that the wording could be better in quality for checks like bigfiles--in some checks, violations is the thing they output. With some checks, it's...

Thanks for the input! I'd definitely be open to a PR expressing a well thought out and general way of expressing the violations vs threshold nature of different types of...

Yeah, I don't make releases terribly often, so if you want to use this having an old RuboCop is a danger. Sadly, your ability to lock RuboCop in your local...

Another practical matter here is that pronto-rubocop is awaiting a release that will support Rubocop >=1: https://github.com/prontolabs/pronto-rubocop/issues/47

That's correct; there's a [Docker image](https://github.com/apiology/quality/blob/master/DOCKER.md) also published here. Happy to answer questions you have about it; the general goal of it is to provide an alternative way to run...

Thanks, @MikeAgranoff! I agree that our vaccine model is outdated. You can find what seems to me to be the best idea on how to improve it is under 'Modernize...