Anita Caron
Anita Caron
@coderabbitai full review
I can improve the wording, but the ontology IRI is not part of the count related to the terms.
If I change the message to `0 invalid term IRIs. The Ontology IRI is not valid.` would it help?
I'm not sure, there's only one ontology IRI.
It's in the new PR https://github.com/obophenotype/uberon/pull/3197#issuecomment-1927019687
Is this Primates the same as [this one](https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ols4/ontologies/ncbitaxon/classes/http%253A%252F%252Fpurl.obolibrary.org%252Fobo%252FNCBITaxon_9443)? If so, we can use the same url then.
According to the [README](https://github.com/OBOFoundry/purl.obolibrary.org/tree/master?tab=readme-ov-file#custom-term-browsers) at the purl system, only OBO admins can change obo.yml, which is necessary when defining a custom term browser. I've created an issue there.
Hi @DarkKnight0-0 You can check the OBO NOR Dashboard results [here](https://obofoundry.org/obo-nor.github.io/dashboard/exmo/dashboard.html)
@DarkKnight0-0 Please note that there's another step that runs a lexical matching tool to check for lexical overlap with existing OBO ontologies. The results will be available soon after 22...
Base plus is still not available.